User talk:RHB/Archive 2

Re Exponents (math)

I don't see any objection to a merge, but it didn't make any sense to me to prod it. Thanks for the comment. Georgewilliamherbert 00:05, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

RE:Alexander Litvinenko

I don't understand how his birth date is one of the two, could'nt you find out the "real date"

• Some more citations in Early life
• few references with space after puncuation, [5], [14]
• Way too many external links, if you use any as a reference remove them

Automated review

• Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.^[?]
• See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.^[?] - I highly doubt it - only books covers/tv screenshots etc. Someone newsworthy and now dead is good enough FUR surely?

*If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}} along with the required parameters to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information.^[?]

• There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
  • allege
  • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).^[?]
• Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honour (B) (American: honor), meter (A) (British: metre), organize (A) (British: organise), recognize (A) (British: recognise), ization (A) (British: isation), programme (B) (American: program ).
• Avoid using contractions like: won't.Both instances direct quotes.
• As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]^[?]

Once you have dealt with these issues give me a message and i will take a look. However, with the current event banner it will not be a GA, if its about the poisoning not much need for it. M3tal H3ad 13:00, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

I think there's still too many ext links, perhaps ask someone else. Also in the poisoning paragraph the one about January 20 there's an external jump that needs to be converted into a ref. M3tal H3ad 01:21, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 22nd, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 4	22 January 2007	About the Signpost

Wikipedia modifies handling of "nofollow" tag	WikiWorld comic: "Truthiness"
News and notes: Talk page template, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:42, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse

It is a good thing that you are concerned about the article's you rating, but as long as it is not about some images or stylistic issues we are hardly able to help you due to the lack of organized manpower. However, you may contact the main editors and suggest them to take a peer review in the Military history project. This certainly will help. Wandalstouring 22:13, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Please adopt me

Hi, this is the first comment I have ever written on Wikipedia, having only created my account this evening.

I am really enthusiastic about contributing, but completely clueless, so I am looking to be adopted. You appealed from the list of adopters as I am in the UK too, and would be interested in working on British projects. Am also a massive fan of Blackadder and Harry Potter! Albus1976 01:20, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for fixing my problem!!!

--Nirajrm ^{talk ||| sign plz!} 20:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Murder of Tom ap Rhys Pryce

Hey good work on the article, your putting me to shame. Oh well, so now that its up to GA status, i was thinking do you think we could bring it to FA status.--Fabio^Talk 22:57, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alexander Litvinenko

The article Alexander Litvinenko you nominated as a good article has failed , see Talk:Alexander Litvinenko for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a review. Wikiwoohoo 15:58, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 29th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 5	29 January 2007	About the Signpost

Foundation names advisory board, new hires	Court decisions citing Wikipedia proliferate
Microsoft approach to improving articles opens can of worms	WikiWorld comic: "Hyperthymesia"
News and notes: Investigation board deprecated, milestones	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 18:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Adoption

RHB,

 Hey, I'm up for adoption!--Furon 20:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Litvinenko photograph

It might just be worth a quick email to BBC News to ask for permission. Otherwise, true, Wikipedia does come under US copyright laws only so the image would be allowable under fair use. Permission from the BBC directly would just make it all that little bit more clear cut. Wikiwoohoo 23:21, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Have you contacted the BBC? If not, I am willing to review the article as it is. Wikiwoohoo 16:07, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Thomas Crisp

Thanks for your help with getting this article past A-Class review, especially finding those web sources for me, a couple were very useful and the others helped corroborate and expand the remembrance section. I'm gonna submit this to FAC in the next few days just to see how it does, if ou have any further comments then please let me know and I'll address them. Thanks again.--Jackyd101 01:31, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Proposed Wikipedia talk:Notability (news)

In the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Tom ap Rhys Pryce in which you participated, some editors suggested the need for a guideline where a consensus could be reached regarding whether everything which is newsworthy is also encyclopedic. I have created a draft of a proposed guideline Wikipedia talk:Notability (news). Your input is welcome. Thanks. Edison 15:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

BAE Systems GA comments

Thanks very much for those. You're right about citing the products and joint venture sections, I assumed common knowledge but in hindsight statements like "Its Hawk advanced jet trainer aircraft has been widely exported." do need citations. Regarding "Do we know anything about BAE's future?" - I'll have a think about it, however at the moment all that I can think of would border on original research.

As for "Make sure dates and units use adhere to the WP:MOS and keep footnotes after punctuation" - was that just a general reminder or did you notice a few problems? That was one of the major pieces of cleanup I did after the last FAC and later comments on the talk page.

Thanks again for your help. Mark83 18:35, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

George Calvert

Just wanted to say thanks for the peer review on George Calvert, 1st Baron Blatimore. Mocko13 15:26, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Could use the proferred help in 'Britifying' the spelling on the article whenever you get the chance. Mocko13 02:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your help! Let me buy you a beer... Mocko13 13:02, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that

For your patience with my slowness. :)

You and I were evidently reverting the same article--you just got to it first, which made my edit re-insert the vandalism. Justin Eiler 18:52, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Dad's Army episodes

Those are good questions. You are allowed to include spoilers. My standard explanation about the mini-synopses is to write a good, short paragraph that sums up the plot. If that includes spoilers then so be it. Just make sure to add {{spoiler}} at the top. If you want to use the existing books for inline citations you can simply include Harvard style citations inside the ref tags. If you aren't familiar with that style it is (last_name page_#). When you have two books by the same author include the year of publication. For instance you coulde use <ref>Croft (2003), 46</ref>. As for the unofficial website I'm not too sure, you'll probably want to ask around more. I don't have a problem because it just gives the episode titles and broadcast order, there's nothing that would need to be additionally confirmed. Since there's no official list, there would only be two ways to replace it: DVD liner notes (don't know if there are those with this show) or getting every issue of a TV Guide style magazine with every original broadcast, which no one would expect you to do. Hope that helps. Jay32183 19:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 12th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 7	12 February 2007	About the Signpost

US government agencies discovered editing	Comment prompts discussion of Wikimedia's financial situation
Board recapitulates licensing policy principles	WikiWorld comic: "Extreme ironing"
News and notes: Picture of the Year, milestones	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:29, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Miranda raison.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Miranda raison.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:12, 15 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 02:12, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

You said: "4/5 of the pictures I have are FU of current living people - all on Spooks related talk pages. They can all be deleted, and I'll tag the rest with the same tags you used now. Thanks for reminding me."

Thank you, much appreciated. You can use {{db-author|Fair-use of living person}} to get them speedied. --Yamla 02:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Copyediting Dragons of Winter Night

As I am assuming you're unfamiliar with the subject material, would you consider copyediting the article (particularly the plot summary)? It would really be helpful. Thanks! DoomsDay349 04:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tagging

Hi there. If you see an article that looks like it's a copyvio, don't forget to check the page history to see if there are any non-copyio revisions of the page that you could revert to instead. If there are some good revisions in the history, you can leave a note at Wikipedia:Copyright problems or a similar page to say that there are some copyvio revisions that need deleting. This came up in relation to American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry, which as it turns out was a stub which only had the copyrighted material introduced today. --bainer (talk) 23:20, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Edit warring

You left me a message on edit warring saying that's what I'm doing but if I am are you not aswell? Somethingoranother 00:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank-you, I am cautious of the 3RR. Community action is always best in these circumstances! There appears to be a history of this type of contribution. Jhamez84 00:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Beechcraft 1900

Hi, RHB, and thank you.

I will try to do so. This is an area I am just learning, so my efforts might be incomplete. In the next week, I will try to tackle this. If you see me going down the wrong track, just let me know. Best. 69.19.14.35 02:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 19th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 8	19 February 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor
Arbitrator Dmcdevit resigns; replacements to be appointed	Essay questions Wikipedia's success: Abort, Retry, Fail?
In US, half of Wikipedia traffic comes from Google	WikiWorld comic: "Tony Clifton"
News and notes: Brief outage, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Helping out with the Unassessed Wikipedia Biographies

Seeing that you are an active member of the WikiBiography Project, I was wondering if you would help lend a hand in helping us clear out the amount of [unassessed articles] tagged with {{WPBiography}}. Many of them are of stub and start class, but a few are of B or A caliber. Getting a simple assessment rating can help us start moving many of these biographies to a higher quality article. Thank you! --Ozgod 21:50, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 26th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 9	26 February 2007	About the Signpost

Three users temporarily desysopped after wheel war	Peppers article stays deleted
Pro golfer sues over libelous statements	Report from the Norwegian (Bokmål) Wikipedia
WikiWorld comic: "Pet skunk"	News and notes: New arbitrators appointed, milestones
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:30, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikiproject Biography March 2007 Newsletter

The March 2007 issue of the Biography WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Mocko13 22:01, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
• Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, and project-wide collaboration.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a variety of guidelines for article structure and content, template use, categorization, and other issues that you may find useful.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Wandalstouring 23:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Can you help me?

Hi, there has been this guy on the Dr.Eggman article who's been typing in false facts in the article. Every time I change it, he changes it back. I've been trying to talk with him for a long time, but he completely ignores me, and even when I ask him to provide proof for what he's writing, he still ignores me. Could you tell me how to ban him? Thanks. 207.224.61.246 04:24, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

List of Dad's Army episodes - a little something

		The Original Barnstar
		In recognition of his hard work in making List of Dad's Army episodes into a featured list. Well done. Bob talk 16:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Deletion of pages

You told me on my talk page to contact you here if I had any questions about the criteria for notability of an artist/band.

It seems to me that I'd written a perfectly good article; not only had I given detailed and accurate information about the band, I had also made a claim to their notability. On the Notability (music) page, the following is said:

Important note: Failing to satisfy the notability guidelines is not a criterion for speedy deletion. An article that fails to even claim that the subject of the article is notable can be speedily deleted under criterion A7, however. A mere claim of notability, even if contested, may avoid deletion under A7 and require a full Article for Deletion process to determine if the subject of the article is notable.

I would take this to mean that at least some thought would be given, before the page was mercilessly deleted, given that a suitable claim to notability had been made. I made such a claim (the creation of a new genre of music) and yet the page was deleted, without explanation.

If there were any other criteria the article did not fulfill, please inform me of them, so I can improve the article.

A speedy reply would be much appreciated. Byntje 10:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Adoption

Hi! Will you please adopt me? --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 19:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Assessment from an article page

Thank you for helping out with the Biography assessment drive. Good news. Outriggr recently designed a script that will cut youf biography assessment time down by about ten fold (what took ten hours now may only take one hour with Outriggr's script). For more information, please see the 'assessment from article page' discussion. -- Jreferee 20:11, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 5th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 10	5 March 2007	About the Signpost

New Yorker correction dogs arbitrator into departure	WikiWorld comic: "The Rutles"
News and notes: Picture of the Year, milestones	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:35, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

My monobook (copied from here)

I find it pretty useful and rarely have any problems. Twinkle is excellent. Feel free to copy it over, and I will gladly explain about any you aren't sure of. RHB ^{Talk - Edits} 21:10, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I copied it. I look forward to figuring it all out. I'll post on your talk page if I have questions. -- Jreferee 23:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Notification!

This is just a friendly reminder that Wikipedia Weekly has been released with a new episode..... 14!

The link to all versions of Wikipedia Weekly 14 is at http://wikipediaweekly.com/2007/03/11/wikipedia-weekly-14/

The OGG version is here The MP3 version (non free file format but it works on an iPod) is here

In this edition

   * We wrap up the Essjay affair, as the famous Wikipedian cuts ties to the online encyclopedia.
   * A look at the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year Competition, which finished earlier this week. In addition, all the Featured Pictures of 2006 are available as a bittorrent download.
   * The new “Username Usurpation” feature at the English Wikipedia.
   * Jimmy Wales travels to India for the recent Indian WikiCamp, and narrowly survives an attack of ninja monkeys.
   * One thousand Featured Articles at the German Wikipedia.
   * 300 Spartans.

As always you can download old episodes and more at http://wikipediaweekly.com/!

Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!

For Tawker and the rest of the Wikipedia Weekly crew -- Tawkerbot 19:35, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

You are recieving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to recieve such notifications please remove yourself from the list.

You have new questions at Editor review

The Transhumanist   04:40, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 12th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 11	12 March 2007	About the Signpost

Report of diploma mill offering pay for edits	Essay tries to clarify misconceptions about Wikipedia
Blog aggregator launched for Wikimedia-related posts	WikiWorld comic: "Cartoon Physics"
News and notes: Wikimania 2007, milestones	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:40, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

You awarded me a barnstar. Yay! Thank you. I took a break from rating articles for a while (I was trying to figure out how to modify the tools I'd built for myself so that other people could use them too, to speed things up) but will probably get back to it later this week. I copied the barnstar to my userpage, I hope that's okay. I'm somewhat new to Wikipedia (as an editor at least) and participating in the biography project has helped me out a lot, by letting me see a good cross-section of the biography articles, and to learn what makes a good article. I'm not usually so talkative, but you made me happy today. Thank you again. --Sapphic 15:37, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Notification!

This is just a friendly reminder that Wikipedia Weekly has been released with a new episode..... 15!

The link to all versions of Wikipedia Weekly 14 is at [1]

The OGG version is here The MP3 version (non free file format but it works on an iPod) is here

In this edition

This episode sees Liam, more commonly known as Witty Lama, catching up with Rama’s Arrow and Ragib to talk about contributing to Wikipedia from and Indian and Bangladeshi perspective. Topics include their growing collection of Featured Articles, the success of the Indian WikiProject, and the problem of Internet access on the Subcontinent.

As always you can download old episodes and more at http://wikipediaweekly.com/!

Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!

For Tawker and the rest of the Wikipedia Weekly crew -- Tawkerbot 23:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to receive such notifications please remove yourself from the list.

HMS Royal Oak (1914) now an FA

As you may now know, HMS Royal Oak (1914) is a featured article. Let me take the opportunity to thank you for not only adding supporting comments to its FA candidacy, but particularly for providing a through and very useful Good Article review. This was a considerable impetus to me to take the extra steps to further improve the article. Thanks, and regards, — BillC ^talk 22:14, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm eyeing up Electricity, which is not in particularly good shape for such an important article. — BillC ^talk 23:23, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Your NPWatcher Application

Dear RHB,

Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.

Martinp23 16:58, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject England

Hello! You have probably noticed that WikiProject England has been inactive recently and I and other members are working on making it active again and getting more members to join. I am kindly asking for your help tagging articles for class and importance using {{WPE}}, their are literally thousands of articles at Category:England and all of its sub-categories which urgently need tagging ad your help is needed! For more information about theses templates please see the Project Page and I hope you are enjoying being a member!! Tellyaddict 21:17, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Bernard van Orley

On 15 March 2007 you assessed the article Bernard van Orley and gave it a B. At that time the article was only half-finished. Now that I have finished it at last, I kindly request you to look at it again, re-assess it and perhaps copyedit it, as I'm not a native English speaker. This article is now probably the most comprehensive biography of Bernard van Orley available on the internet, as most other sites only repeat the same few biographic details over and over again without thorough research. Thanks in advance. JoJan 18:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Editor review

You have requested an editor review. Please answer the first two questions, since these answers provide critical information. Leave me a note on my talk page that you did so, and I'll try to respond as soon as I can. YechielMan 14:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

I reviewed you. YechielMan 01:58, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 12	20 March 2007	About the Signpost

WikiWorld comic: "Wilhelm Scream"	News and notes: Bad sin, milestones
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:25, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 13	26 March 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor: Tardiness, volunteers, RSS
Patrick and Wool resign in office shakeup	WikiWorld comic: "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo"
News and notes: Board resolutions, milestones	Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007

The March 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 19:57, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Notification!

This is just a friendly reminder that Wikipedia Weekly has been released with a new episode..... 16!

The link to all versions of Wikipedia Weekly 16 is at [2]

The OGG version is here The MP3 version (non free file format but it works on an iPod) is here

In this edition

Lots of stuff, too much to list here.

As always you can download old episodes and more at http://wikipediaweekly.com/!

Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in! Feel free to post to the mailing lists too.... apparently not many people know about us.... yet

For Tawker and the rest of the Wikipedia Weekly crew -- Tawkerbot 06:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to receive such notifications please remove yourself from the list.

Signpost updated for April 2nd, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 14	2 April 2007	About the Signpost

Poll finds people think Wikipedia "somewhat reliable"	Wikipedia biographical errors attract more attention
Association of Members' Advocates nominated for deletion	Reference desk work leads to New York Times correction
WikiWorld comic: "Charles Lane"	News and notes: Alexa, Version 0.5, attribution poll
Wikipedia in the news	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

The Met

I changed the copyright tag because I am against the notices at the top of articles, which has nothing to do with the article itself. Read this and you will see why.

If you want to request unprotection you should go to the Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Current requests for unprotection

Sorry i could not be of anymore help

Kind regards

Dep. Garcia ( Talk | Help Desk | Complaints ) 20:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Honours of Winston Churchill

Did you know? was updated. On 10 April, 2007, a fact from the article Honours of Winston Churchill, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 06:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 9th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 15	9 April 2007	About the Signpost

Danny Wool regains adminship in controversial RFA	Leak last year likely to produce changes for handling next board election
Association of Members' Advocates' deletion debate yields no consensus	WikiWorld comic: "Fake shemp"
News and notes: Donation, Version 0.5, milestones	Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Did you know?

On 12 April, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kenneth Farrow, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 19:55, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

List of George Cross recipients

Hi, when I created that list, I made sure that all the names which are linked on it link to the correct person and I also checked as far as I could for any on the list who already had pages under different names and I linked those to the list (although it is possible I missed some). The list does not include any persons awarded the Edward Medal, the Albert Medal or the Empire Gallantry Medal, all of which were united with the George Cross in 1972. I would suggest that all persons on the list are notable; the George Cross is the most senior award avaliable to British and Commonwealth military or civilians when not in the face of the enemy (for which the Victoria Cross is used). At the time of the award of these medals, they would all have attacted press interest, and all are included in books covering the George Cross thus are the subject of published sources. Thanks for your interest, if you have any more questions please let me know.--Jackyd101 20:03, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Ataturk rating

Oh dear, have I hurt your feelings? Sorry about that, don't take it too personally. However, the point is that there are so many A-class rated articles for the WPBiography project, and many of them don't even come close. So I have taken it upon me to assess if these articles are really A-class, and the first part of it is whether they violate any Wikipedia guidelines. If so, that is an automatic downgrade, and I even added pointers as to why they were downgraded. Now I don't see how that is deflating for the main editors. These articles don't follow the guidelines as they are supposed to when they are rated A-class; it's as simple as that.

Apparently you have seen my list of criteria, and I wouldn't say they are trivial reasons. They are all reasons why these articles won't succeed as a Featured Article Candidate. As for the Ataturk rating: how many references there are, I don't really care about. It's the unsourced statements that bother me, and in the Ataturk article, there are simply too many. I don't think you'll believe me when I say this, so I've gone ahead and put in a few examples of statements I want to see referenced. I am not a fan of these tags, as I find they distract from reading, so I would have preferred if the writers came up with more references themselves.

Oh, and by the way: you're wrong about references only being needed where they are likely to be challenged. Only when statements are absolutely common knowledge, such as water is wet, references are not needed. Otherwise, it will be difficult to assess whether statements are original research or not. So sometimes 20 references are enough, and on other occasions 58 are not enough. Sorry again. Errabee 22:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Well, I don't expect much opposition for the criteria I've set. If you look at the text of what an A-class article should be, it clearly states that a picture is needed. The Good Article criteria require that all pictures should be appropriately tagged, and if fair use is asserted, a fair use rationale needs to be stated. Another criterion for GA is the Manual of Style, and in particular the Article lead guideline. I think this covers at least the first three criteria I've set, and most if not all downgraded articles fail one or more of these criteria. In fact, I should have stripped some articles from the GA-status they have due to these concerns, but I found that too much. I'll return to compiling my list. Errabee 23:02, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

The list has been compiled and posted. Errabee 00:18, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 16th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 16	16 April 2007	About the Signpost

Encyclopædia Britannica promoted to featured article	Wikipedia continues to get mixed reactions in education
WikiWorld comic: "Hodag"	News and notes: Wikipedia television mention makes news, milestones
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:28, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

British anti-invasion preparations of World War II

I thought that you might like to know that British anti-invasion preparations of World War II has been put forward as a featured article candidate. Your opinions would be most welcome. Gaius Cornelius 20:11, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

A brief note of thanks for your assistance with this article and for your support in the featured article nomination. Gaius Cornelius 13:08, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

A-class review request

It seems User:Michkalas has stumbled on my testpages for the A-class review department, and has submitted Leonard Orban for review. I'd appreciate your opinion (support or oppose) and reasons on Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/A-class review/Leonard Orban. Thanks! Errabee 15:42, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Newsletter

As far as I'm concerned, the WPBIO April newsletter is good to go :) As you've seen (I believe), I've tagged it as "sent" but that's just in case we forgot to tag is as sent later on. Feel free to give it a final copyedit or add any breaking news. Cheers. --kingboyk 22:08, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 23rd, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 17	23 April 2007	About the Signpost

Administrator goes rogue, is blocked	Wales unblocks Brandt, then reverses himself
Historian detained after his Wikipedia article is vandalized	Efforts to reform Requests for Adminship spark animated discussion
Canadian politician the subject of an edit war	Virginia Tech massacre articles rise to prominence
Wikipedia enters China one disc at a time	WikiWorld comic: "Buttered cat paradox"
News and notes: Unreferenced biographies, user studies, milestones	Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:57, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

The WikiProject Biography Newsletter: Issue II - April 2007

The April 2007 issue of the WikiProject Biography newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you BetacommandBot 19:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

The "bad faith" issue on the AfD

Please see here where Kitty states that he forced the AfD]] therefore it was not a bad faith nomination. I am happy for you to !vote keep but I would appriciate if you please now strike through that section of the statement.--Vintagekits 23:03, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 18	30 April 2007	About the Signpost

Students in Western Civilization course find editing Wikipedia frustrating, rewarding	Statistics indicate breadth of Wikipedia's appeal
Featured lists reaches a milestone	Backlogs continue to grow
WikiWorld comic: "Calvin and Hobbes"	News and notes: Board resolutions, user studies, milestones
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:42, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Notification!

Hello. This is just a friendly notice that Wikipedia Weekly episode 19 has been released!

In this episode:

• New Mission and Vision statements for the WMF
• The Chaser springs Jimmy Wales
• new uses for categories
• vandalism studies
• Unreferenced BLPs.

.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.com/2007/05/05/wikipedia-weekly-19/ and as always, you can download old episodes and more at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.

Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!

For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 20:57, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to receive such notifications please remove yourself from the list.

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007)

The April 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:44, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

WP:ADOPT input

Hello, RHB. The Adopt-a-User program is looking for new ideas and input on the program. If you are still interested please stop by the talk page and read some of the ideas being floated and give a comment. If you want to update or change your information on the adopter's list page, now would be a great time! Thanks! V60 ^{干什么？ · VDemolitions} 03:49, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 7th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 19	7 May 2007	About the Signpost

Four administrator accounts desysopped after hijacking, vandalism	Digg revolt over DVD key spills over to Wikipedia
Debate over non-free images heats up	Update on Wikimania 2007
Norwegian Wikipedian awarded scholarship	WikiWorld comic: "Friday the 13th"
News and notes: Election volunteers, admin contest, milestones	Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:33, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Hovhannes Bagramyan

I'm sorry for having missed the "Sexy Army" vandalism on Hovhannes Bagramyan during my reverts and then causing an editing conflict when I attempted to change it. I was to focused on removing the Weird Al picture while preserving some of the valid edits that had taken place.--YanA 17:58, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 14th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 20	14 May 2007	About the Signpost

Administrator status restored to five accounts after emergency desysopping	User committed identities provide protection against account hijacking
Academic journals multiply their analyses of Wikipedia	WikiWorld comic: "Ubbi dubbi"
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

London postal districts

Every time they are nominated for deletion they get saved with (what I consider to be) poor reasoning. It is as if it has been suggested that the actual area should be erased from existence. I find it totally irrational as the articles have been stubs for ages and have no hope of being expanded. I was tempted to start a discussion sub page, with a list of suggestions for each postcode article (i.e. keep, redirect etc.). However, the strength of opinion seems so strong to keep "as is" I am minded just to leave things. I think you sometimes have to respect the opinions of people even if you are convinced the rationale of their opinion is flawed. It isn't the end of the world if the articles remain. MRSC • Talk 22:41, 16 May 2007 (UTC)